Sustainability Challenges in the Organisation-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the System Thinking Is Critical In Developing Solutions to Sustainability Challenges. Answer: The technique that endures the biological system which is both productive and can remain diverse in order to maintain balance is commonly known as the sustainability. However, in the 21st century, the definition of the Sustainability has changed in a rapid way where it focuses over the requirement and development of sustainable models in order to maintain the earth and change it to a health environment. The main motive is for well survival of human race. It is said to be a balanced act that maintains the quotation said by the United Nation in 1987 value he needs of the present without compromising the well-being of the future generation. The Earth Charter in 2000 briefed the definition further that involved the concept of society founded on respect for nature, universal human rights, economic justice and a culture of peace. For the achievement of these goals human beings must re-examine the policies related to the environment protection, Social responsibilities and economic practices . The basic concept of sustainable development is the need for conservation of energy since with every growth in the economy and consumption of energy environmental degradation is how the nature who pays the cost. This cannot be stopped but there can be ways to slow down the process degradation and prevent pollution, conserve the natural resources and hence protect the environment to get depleted completely. An access to the nutrition, health care, clear water, food, shelter, employment, energy, opportunities in the economic and education equally, is how a sustainable society looks like. Business in Sustainable development faces several new paradigms, which demands for the well being of the environment, the employees and for the future generations prospect. As well as there are expectations for the business to get improved, along with the fund innovation, profitability and hence increase the market shares for the stakeholders (Costa at al. 2013). As stated in the statement that for the developing solutions to sustainable challenges the system thinking plays a critical role, it is said that sustainable business follows three strategies: Preservation of the environment and conservation of natural resources, building the social equity, well-being of support, promoting fare trades and maximizing the long-term profitability and promotes the growth of the environment. The statement given is co mpliant because the rapid use of the words sustainability has evolved and has been accepted in almost every sector. A professor of University of Michigan has explained that the critical state of the economic, social system and environment has to be strengthening by increasing the velocity, uncertainty and complexity (del Mar Alonso-Almeida et al. 2015). To dictate the inter-relationship other than ideally watching the Patterns of changing, the system thinking works on a trans-disciplinary framework. Sustainability and System Thinking should be regarded as set that are complementary. System theories provide the discussions that are theoretical based about sustainability and the sustainability gives an overview of the vital parts of practical relevance over the system thinking. A system thinker hence evaluates the problem to pattern behavior over time ignoring the fact to focus on a particular event. The system approach toward problem solving hence has criticisms (Becker et al. 2015). The system dependency more on models and actual solutions threatens the legitimacy to management of education and boardrooms. But it is always on requirement to diagnose the problem such that to figure out the possible way to fix it and hence implementing solutions having similar outcomes and thus believing that system thinking is necessary for sustainable challenges. Acceptance of sustainable development is still an issue: the first issue is of appropriate geographical scale, thus the sustainable planning is said to be not much efficient in larger regions, and the second issue is for the implementation of effective tool in sustainable development. Systems thinking is critical to the development of solutions to sustainability challenges because the system thinking concerns with the whole development of the organization and society, it has a definite process to deal with systems, it concerns with the underlying dynamics and also deals with the planning and pattern of the work to be done for the betterment of the environment. There are situations when there are violated and hence there is always a need of critical thinking for sustainable development. There are several examples like the Coal-Seam Gas extraction in Australia, termed as one of the wicked problem in sustainable development. This shows the misuse of the energy policy in the country. The problem was severe as the gas industry in Australia (Aemo) Australian Energy Market Operators made it very clear to the customers that there will be a crisis for some amount of time (Benn, Dunphyand Griffiths 2014). Due to the declination of gas production there may also be crisis for the summer in 2018-2019 in Australia (Colson et al. 2014). The country not only produces gas for themselves but also for consumers outside, which are been exported. The main aim of the essay is to explain the critical use of System thinking in development of solutions to sustainable challenges, along with an example examining the situation related to it in brief and hence summarize the need of sustainable development for the betterment of environment. System thinking is important to deal with the difficulty and challenges of sustainability since this approach deals with the problems from a macroscopic level rather than just over-viewing it ("Explainer: coal seam gas, shale gas and fracking in Australia", 2017). System thinking has been found in 1956 by Professor Jay Forrester. Since then this has been in practice till date. Traditional analysis approaches deals with the studied document whereas system thinking approaches focuses on the interrelationships within the different constituents of the system. There are three main parts in the system thinking: Purpose, Elements and Function. The first part deals with the purpose of the adoption of the system thinking, second part with the various elements of the system thinking and the last part deals with the interrelationships of the system elements (Bebbington, Unermanand O'Dwyer 2014). The business practicing on the well being of the environment and the future generation are also expe cted to improve and provide profitability, serve innovation and increase the market share for current stakeholders. But perusing these surrounds the business with challenges like: Defining the corporate sustainability, providing potential benefits to the society and environment and creating examples for the sustainable business and the practical works related to it. To corporate with the system thinking in a practical way, there should be good framework by which one can understand the organization. There are five certain areas which are combination of five policies and a single wicked problem often have connectivity with the other problems and thus each of these areas have consequences with each other. The areas that are co-related are Jay Galbraiths five-point star model: structures, processes, strategies, reward systems and people. As there are two approaches to strive down the problems, there are ways to show how system thinking can help in diagnosing the challenges arouse for gl obal sustainable development. The key variables for the consumption and brainstorms the critically obstructs the links in between. The business activities and economic development are drives related to the consumption. These two links are directly proportional to each other that is, either one of them grow will let the other grow as well, similarly when one of them declined the other declines as well. There is another point that concerns the full state of the environment which is easily degraded by not effecting any change to any other variable. Green house gas emission, solid waste accumulation, biodiversity and waste are negative change for many variables but this does not affects too many other variables. Causal loops are described as a vital learning tool in system thinking and helps to balance variables in loops. For example on increase of use of technological efficiency there is a decrease in use of resources. Thus, an increase of overall use of resource because of higher busi ness activity there is an initial decrease profited from efficiency area (Blevis et al. 2015). System thinkings nature makes it easier to solve even complicated problems when it focuses on the interaction of constituents with one another. The example of the problem related to the topic Fracking (Coal-Seam Gas extraction) in Australia, where Farmers of Queensland and NSW protested over the safety and threats on the countrys greenery and food security. The gas that has come from shale and Coal Seam Gas (CSG) are chemically similar. This generates heat and equal amount of carbon dioxide when burned or supplied to electric power plants 15 years ago shale gas suppliers were non-existent but today it has been increased up to 20-25% of the total gas consumed. The most powerful tool for analyzing the complete problems of sustainability the Three Pillar of Sustainability is the best way. This approach consists of the three pillars: The Economic, Social and Environment pillar. There is a vital requirement of these three pillars of sustainability requires system thinking. If one of the pillars gets weak the others as well get affected. The recent fracture stimulation generally known as the Fracking innovations has turned drastically the natural gas market. The cost strikes from lower to some stable price since the market now delivers shale gases to the customer in winter season. Coal Seam gases are shallower having higher concentration of gases than shale gases. The traditional gas reservoirs and oil gases are more expensive as compared to the CSG, Shale gas etc (Yang, Newman and Forlizzi2014). Shale gas and CSG comes in cheaper rate than renewable gases or resources. But the mixture of fracture stimulation of shale gas and coal reservoirs ar e known as the fracking which consists of high-pressure mixture of chemical gases, water and sand in reservoir. The stimulation process is noisy and takes few days from shallow coal seam gas making difficulties to the people living merely. The rapid use of chemicals in the manufacturing of these gas like Diluted acids, gel, KCL, Oxygen Scavenger etc are mostly used for sterilizing, making plastics, detergents, soaps and other chemical industries. Use of these gases affects the peoples health condition staying in the area (Blevis et al. 2015). Since the use of Coal-Seam Gas in Australia and in other exported countries are in high demand, because of the cheaper cost and more effective way of exposure there is an ethical dilemma amongst the people for further use of these kind of gases. As per the topic we agree at a very extent that there is always a requirement of System thinking in the sustainable development. For some basic principles of system thinking applied in leadership and management are: 1. System thinking plays a management disciplinary concerning the understanding of the system requirement that interacts between the components comprising entirety of that defined system; 2. The organization that is completely related to the environment provides a means of analysis and understanding to the organization; 3. The systems must have thought about clearing the external boundaries or may have created links with the environment; 4. The organization may suffer from system failure in entity. The failure in between or within the elements of the system, that has occurred in the high-level system or the total system that needs to be working together to get an overall success; 5. The system failure may sometimes co-exist beside the functional success. The leadership of silos may not be sufficiently integrated in the total system that owns a shortcoming in the system design, understanding and management. ; 6. Systematic failure may include factors like confused goals, flawed design, weak system wide understanding, individual incentives that may encourage the loyalty to sub-ordinates rather than super ordinate goals, weak system-wide understanding, inadequate feedback, lack of accountability, poor cooperation etc; 7. The lower sub-system level operators like individual executives are free of responsibilities and blames in the cases of systematic failure; 8. The whole systems boundary would be chosen and hence defined at some level that suits the particular purpose under consideration like a complete school system or the education system.; 9. The understanding of the working process of the whole system intending the process of the work done, actually works as it buckle under pressure that may practically defeat and elude most exclusive work (Wang et al. 2015). The highest priority of the whole system must be the environmental sustainability. Since the lower capacity of carrying the environment leads to the lower in the common delivery of goods and thus lesser output of the economic system could be produced. System thinking also provides the ability to deal complex problems like obesity. It has been very useful for the system approach that deals with the healthcare issues like cardiovascular diseases, tobacco control and mental health controls other than sustainable development (Penzenstadler et al. 2014). Casual loop diagrams are good approach to the system thinking. This system can consider the vitality of situations and conditions during the implementation phases get involved. On dealing with the wicked situations and problems under the system approach where changes in one element can affect the impact of the other element as well. There is a need of the involvement in system thinking approach. A causal loop diagram comprises of four main components: the factors, the connections between them, the signs on the connections (which demonstrate how the factors are interconnected), and the indication of the circle (which indicates what sort of conduct the framework will create). By speaking to an issue or issue from a causal point of view, there can turn out to be more mindful of the basic powers that deliver perplexing conduct. The inclusion of the thinking system approach enables the complex sustainable challenges from difficult view of the world. The traditional method that deals with the problem also provides some effective results such that the problem does not grow in any rapid pace. The process of sustainability development goals is by ending poverty, protecting the planet, environment and ensures prosperity for everyone for being the part of new sustainability development agenda. Therefore, system thinking Interdependency, solution seeking, Shared vision of future, Cross-functional teamwork, Strategic Management System, Serve the customer and has Clear outcome expectations, hence is much reliable than any traditional approach. All the agendas may have some specific goals and targets that may be achieved over the next coming years. And for the goals to be reach ed, all the people and organization may need to be responsible for their part. References Bebbington, J., Unerman, J. and O'Dwyer, B. eds., 2014.Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge. Becker, C., Chitchyan, R., Duboc, L., Easterbrook, S., Penzenstadler, B., Seyff, N. and Venters, C.C., 2015, May. Sustainability design and software: the karlskrona manifesto. InSoftware Engineering (ICSE), 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on(Vol. 2, pp. 467-476). IEEE. Benn, S., Dunphy, D. and Griffiths, A., 2014.Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge. Blevis, E., Bdker, S., Flach, J., Forlizzi, J., Jung, H., Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. and Rizzo, A., 2015, April. Ecological perspectives in hci: Promise, problems, and potential. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 2401-2404). ACM. Colson, C.M., Nehrir, M.H., Sharma, R.K. and Asghari, B., 2014. Improving sustainability of hybrid energy systems part ii: Managing multiple objectives with a multiagent system.IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy,5(1), pp.46-54. Costa, A.O., Oliveira, L.B., Lins, M.P.E., Silva, A.C.M., Araujo, M.S.M., Pereira Jr, A.O. and Rosa, L.P., 2013. Sustainability analysis of biodiesel production: a review on different resources in Brazil.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,27, pp.407-412. Crane, A. and Matten, D., 2016.Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M., Marimon, F., Casani, F. and Rodriguez-Pomeda, J., 2015. Diffusion of sustainability reporting in universities: current situation and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp.144-154. Explainer: coal seam gas, shale gas and fracking in Australia. (2017).The Conversation. Retrieved 20 August 2017, from [online]; https://theconversation.com/explainer-coal-seam-gas-shale-gas-and-fracking-in-australia-2585 Fernandez, N.C., Lago, P. and Calero, C., 2016. How do Quality Requirements Contribute to Software Sustainability?. InREFSQ Workshop(pp. 7-10). Knowles, B., Clear, A.K., Mann, S., Blevis, E. and Hkansson, M., 2016, May. Design Patterns, Principles, and Strategies for Sustainable HCI. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 3581-3588). ACM. Mowforth, M. and Munt, I., 2015.Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the third world. Routledge. Penzenstadler, B., Raturi, A., Richardson, D. and Tomlinson, B., 2014. Safety, security, now sustainability: The nonfunctional requirement for the 21st century.IEEE software,31(3), pp.40-47. Shiva, V., 2016.Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability and peace. Zed Books Ltd.. Wang, Z., Song, H., Watkins, D.W., Ong, K.G., Xue, P., Yang, Q. and Shi, X., 2015. Cyber-physical systems for water sustainability: challenges and opportunities.IEEE Communications Magazine,53(5), pp.216-222. Yang, R., Newman, M.W. and Forlizzi, J., 2014, April. Making sustainability sustainable: challenges in the design of eco-interaction technologies. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 823-832). ACM.